How you can have your say on the Knowle West Regeneration Framework?
Local people were invited to view and feedback on the development of the plan at the Knowle West Conversations exhibitions from 14th – 17th November.
Urban Initiatives would still like to hear what you think, so your concerns, ideas and priorities will shape the next stage of the planning.
Please view and comment on the Knowle West Conversation results via this website and read the post by Urban Initiatives. You can also read a report on the Knowle West Conversations events.
Interesting article. what was knowle like in the late 1940s. was it prosperous or deprived. how big was its shopping area? was there just one main street. Would be interested to hear. thanks, mike posner
Thank you Tony for a very interesting article! You can follow an update to this thread on his Blogsite…
http://aureamediocritas-tonyd.blogspot.com/2010/01/knowle-west-lessons-learned-or-lessons.html?showComment=1263644711642
It has been suggested that I post a copy of an article from my blog here in the hope that it may generate some debate:
Knowle West: Lessons Learned or Lessons Spurned?
In an earlier posts on my blog, I described how successive generations of my family had gradually moved (or been moved) from central Bristol slums to Knowle West and on to Hartcliffe. The midpoint of that journey – Knowle West (or Filwood Park if you prefer – an early example of rebranding) – is currently the focus for regeneration efforts and I have recently been reading two documents concerning some of the issues facing Knowle West/Filwood Park and thus the challenges for those seeking its regeneration.
The first document highlights that “the area has the largest population of children and young people out of all Bristol wards” and this, combined with “a low average household income” leads to a number of resulting issues. The second document also mentions “the high proportion of young people” and refers to “exceptional proverty” due in part to the “high incidence of unemployment”.
The first document goes on to mention multiple levels of deprivation in relation to “income, employment, education, health and crime” whilst the second mentions that “nearly half” of children were actually “below the ‘poverty’ line”, and that many illnesses such as asthma were “still far too prevalent” among children, there were also concerns about women’s health issues, whilst hooliganism and crime gave the area a bad reputation the stigma of which “left a lasting impression”, the last echoed by the first document which agrees that the area “suffers a poor image and reputation”.
Both documents agree that unemployment levels in the area are well above the average for Bristol whilst other shared conclusions refer to limited community, social and leisure facilities, poor transport connectivity especially with the City Centre, and poor retail provision within the area. Another key element is that the mix of house types in the area is limited, with the second document pointing to this causing many young couples to leave the area.
Of course, we shouldn’t be surprised that two documents studying the same area should arrive at the same conclusions – except that the first document referred to here is the “Knowle West Regeneration Framework” published in 2009, whilst the second is “Housing Estates: A study of Bristol Corporation policy and practice between the wars” published in 1949 and based on studies that took place before 1939. In other words, two studies separated by 70 years but, in that time, very little appears to have changed to alleviate the poverty and deprivation suffered by many of those living in Knowle West. That must be difficult reading for all those who have been in a position of power in Bristol over the past seven decades.
Jevons and Madge, the authors of the earlier study, called for better design to include such things as better retail provision including small local shops, higher incidence of parks and play areas, provision of crèches, public amenities from the start and cheap (or even free) transport to the city centre. The authors castigate planners for failing to understand the needs of residents; “many planners have failed to appreciate the implications of living in central areas” which are “of primary importance as a guide” to what is required in [new] neighbourhoods. It also points to the need to provide choice and not to allow over-dependence on one provider – “one big pub is often a poor alternative for three small ones”. The authors’ final conclusion was that “denied its traditional institutions and amenities, denied the life and variety which course through the veins of a central area, ….a neighbourhood feels the full burden of its own poverty”.
It seems that their advice fell on deaf years – within two years of the book’s publication, Bristol Corporation had, in 1951, acquired more land on the northern slopes of Dundry where it proceeded to repeat all the errors it had made in Knowle West on an even larger scale. Ironically, growing up on this new estate of Hartcliffe, I remember having to travel to Knowle for many facilities including swimming, the cinema, and for more extensive shopping than the limited choice available locally. I suspect that similar stories of lack of neighbourhood facilities can be heard from those brought up on other estates built in the 50’s and into the 60’s and 70’s. Even with the move away from council planned estates, I am sure the early residents of Bradley Stoke can empathise with the lack of local amenities and public infrastructure.
We can only hope that, this time, the regeneration (or should it be simply “generation”) of Knowle West learns from those early mistakes, that it seeks to fully understand the needs and wants of the local community, and works hard to engage that community in making real and critical decisions about the future of Knowle West. The planners may find it hard to get the local community to involve themselves, 70 years of neglect and unfulfilled promises tends to generate a certain level of understandable cynicism and wariness, but planners should not give up too easily and resort to assuming that a “silent majority” means compliancy, and it is additionally to be hoped that no promises are made that cannot be realistically delivered.
Hello sir or madam
Ive been hearing alot of rumours about a possible bypass being put through inns court, im very worried as ive bought mine and was going to sell up but now decided i want to stay so is this true and if so how will that affect us ?
Regards
Mrs R Wilton